Infoshare
Aplikacja konferencyjna dla eventu IT — agenda, mówcy, networking i obsługa offline.
Before the AI era, I built commercial mobile apps in Flutter and Unity. Today, with generative tools, I've added websites and web apps to that stack. I run delivery from idea to launch, adapting to whatever the project or client needs.
I completed the cohort-based 10xDevs course led by Przemek Smyrdek and Marcin Czarkowski — an intensive program on software engineering with AI agents across the whole development cycle, from idea and plan through testing and deployment. The course was built around practice: every module closed with a concrete, working result built on a real project. The certificate, the four badges I earned, and the five areas the course covered are below.
BRAVE / 10xDEVS · Przemek Smyrdek and Marcin Czarkowski
20 July 2026
Prework and 25 lessons across 5 modules, 6 live sessions (kick-off, 4× Live Q&A, celebration) plus weekly office hours. Final project: a custom AI agent and internal tooling built end-to-end.
Enlarge the 10xDevs certificate




Setting up the environment for working with AI agents: a custom toolset, project memory, and rules that keep the agent within the bounds of the task. This is where the agent gets the context and the frame in which it delivers a repeatable result.
A repeatable track from brief to working code: planning, review, and implementation as separate stages, with a clear split between what the agent does and where the human decides. On larger tasks several agents work in parallel, and every change is closed by a code review.
Quality and maintenance of AI-written code: a test plan, a custom QA agent, E2E tests, and bug reporting wired into a repeatable process. The standards that keep a project in good shape long after the first release.
Using generative AI to build new features and tools that genuinely speed up the work. Fresh techniques practiced right away on a working project, so they land straight in the product.
Working with AI in large codebases and legacy projects: mapping the repository, scaling context, and modernizing legacy in the spirit of DDD. Introducing changes safely where the stakes are high, with a modernization plan and documentation generated along the way.
First, what I have documented experience in. AI tooling and business processes — below, as areas I'm actively expanding into.
An overview of my work: commercial mobile apps for Android and iOS, and my own projects built with AI agents.

As a Mobile Developer at Honeti — full lifecycle from planning through implementation, testing, and release to long-term maintenance.
Aplikacja konferencyjna dla eventu IT — agenda, mówcy, networking i obsługa offline.
Aplikacja do nauki dla osób przygotowujących się do egzaminu na uprawnienia budowlane — testy, materiały, model subskrypcyjny dostępu do treści.
Aplikacja klienta końcowego w ekosystemie Gastro Ninja — platforma do zamawiania jedzenia na wynos i dostawę, w modelu podobnym do pyszne.pl / pizzaportal.
AI is part of my production process. Four live projects where you can see it in practice.
A mobile app for managing home inventory: it tracks items by storage location (pantry, fridge, freezer), monitors stock levels, scans barcodes, and builds shopping lists from what's running low.
The web companion of the Neatu ecosystem (neatu.app) — reach your inventory from the browser, alongside the mobile app.
My open-source localization tool. Format-faithful architecture, AI translation through the user's own API keys.
The site you are reading, built with the active assistance of AI agents. The entire process is publicly documented.
The same controlled track from idea to deployment — with a clear split between what we do together, what the agent does on its own, and where a human decides.
Together we settle the full scope of the change: the goal, the area in the code, dependencies, and the order of steps. Project context — conventions, decisions, architecture — is written down and fed to the agent. A concrete plan with clear scope boundaries emerges.
The agent presents the finished plan and I go through it point by point — approving each step or correcting the scope. Code only starts after my approval.
The agent writes code and unit tests.
The agent adds integration tests.
The agent reviews the whole thing and writes up a list of remarks.
I read the collected remarks and the summary from the automated check, then decide: approve the work, order fixes, or reject it. The judgment of quality and fit to the plan stays with the human.
If the review catches something — we go back to "Context and plan" for new decisions.
I check the look and behavior on a real device — catching what only shows up in the finished product. Fixes and polish we do together, until everything works and looks the way it should ship.
Shared work built on CI/CD. The agent prepares the change description, saves it on a separate branch, and opens a pull request. An autonomous agent wired into the repository reviews the changes on its own. The final approval, merge, and deployment are done by me.
What stands behind this track — the methodical foundation and the concrete tools that keep the pace without losing control.
Nothing is built before a written, approved specification. The plan is the contract, and design decisions are recorded ahead of time — before any code exists.
The agent works from durable, versioned project context — conventions, decisions, and memory from earlier sessions. Every task starts from the same, agreed foundation.
A separate session for planning, building, testing, and review — each with its own tools, prompt, and a single task to deliver.
Live library documentation, checking the look in the browser, end-to-end tests on a mobile device. The agent works with real tools in my stack.
Software-development steps wrapped into ready commands the whole team runs — from planning to reviewing changes.
The agent works on a separate branch and opens a pull request at my request. A clear split: what the agent does, what I do, and how it ties into CI/CD.
I'm a self-sufficient developer who runs projects end-to-end and has my own agent-based AI workflow. I've spent 4+ years building commercial mobile apps in Flutter and Unity, and generative tools have extended my stack to websites and web apps. I treat AI as a workshop I steer deliberately at every stage — from architecture through release and maintenance.
The core of my commercial experience is mobile apps. In Flutter I built products from the first line of code: REST API and Firebase integrations, authentication, data sync, offline mode, store releases and ongoing maintenance. In Unity I worked on interactive applications. In both stacks I keep the code readable and the architecture ready to grow years down the line.
The heart of my daily work is programming with AI agents. Claude Code is my daily driver, configured for specific projects: my own subagents, hooks, MCP servers and skills for repeatable tasks. I run the agent in a loop through review, exploring unfamiliar codebases, codemods and scaffolding, so I close more in the same amount of time. Control stays on my side — the agent doesn't merge on its own, and every output goes through build and my code review.
Working with agents shifts where the difficulty sits. Framing the task precisely, designing the context and verifying what comes back all matter more — because the model speeds up good decisions and bad ones alike. I treat it as engineering: I build verifiable loops where generation is fast and the quality gate stays hard. That lets me, as one person, run a project at a scope that used to take a team, and carry it from analysis through maintenance.
I'm a developer who deliberately directs AI agents — and because of that I deliver more quality, faster, across the whole project cycle.
I came to programming after fourteen years as an electrician and installer of CCTV, alarm, fire-safety and smart-home systems. On projects where software meets hardware — IoT, automation, smart buildings — that background gives me a genuinely unique perspective.
I'm the best fit where you're looking for a developer who already has working products under his belt and can work with AI in the workflow. If this profile fits what you're looking for — get in touch and let's talk through the details.